Sentence examples for use of warfare from inspiring English sources

Debye was to tell an American questioner: "The official slogan of the government was 'We must make use of physics for warfare.' We turned it around for our slogan 'We must make use of warfare for physics.'" But that sounds a bit slippery: did they really not try to make the atomic bomb?

Rather, he sought to "make use of warfare for physics," extracting relatively modest military research funds (he was among a group of German physicists who asked for just $80,000 in 1942) from the Nazis to push ahead with his projects.

On a Security Council resolution, the United States, Britain and France have insisted that the document had to use Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter which makes any action mandatory and allows enforcement measures, like sanctions, even if the use of warfare is excluded.

After the use of chemical warfare agents in the first world war, the UK government initiated research at Porton Down to study their potential impact on military capability and the effectiveness of protective measures.

The battle was also noted for the pioneering use of tunnel warfare by the Chinese in the Korean War.

The Japanese use of biological warfare agents against the Chinese led to an American decision to undertake biological warfare research in order to understand better how to defend against the threat and provide, if necessary, a retaliatory capability.

My colleague Scott Shane, in an article on drone warfare last year, posed a few of the tough questions about the spread and use of drone warfare: If China, for instance, sends killer drones into Kazakhstan to hunt minority Uighur Muslims it accuses of plotting terrorism, what will the United States say?

His use of guerrilla warfare to harass and eventually defeat a more powerful enemy provided a model for communist guerrilla warfare in the 20th century.

"We are now faced with this new hybrid warfare... so we have to adapt to improve our capability to address [it]." Does Russia's use of hybrid warfare make it harder, then, for Nato to decide what constitutes an attack on a member state?

"This is the first use of chemical warfare in the 21st century.

Has there been much debate in the US about the use of drone warfare?