Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(14)
Use of this score would have correctly distinguished active therapy from placebo in earlier trials and thus would have avoided some of their misleading conclusions.
The use of this score associate with the use of a systematic colonoscopy, especially when the PALM score is > 14 is a potential forward step to a better management of patient with a high risk of bowel ischemia (as after cardiac surgery).
The use of this score might be helpful for the future as it is based solely on objective clinical parameters.
Future use of this score will need to utilize longitudinal databases that include information regarding long-term disease outcomes.
This score is very well codified and widely accepted: indeed the use of this score to predict mortality risk is codified by International Guidelines [ 44].
To maximise the clinical use of this score, HCC-ART was designed to include simple, non-invasive, and routinely measured markers.
Similar(46)
This supports the current recommendation for the use of this scoring system in Brazil and similar sites with the cut-off of 30 points.
Thus, one important use of this scoring system is in the proper stratification of patients in future trials.
There was a good correlation with Van Nuys Score, supporting the use of this scoring system in routine practice to predict the potential benefits of referral for RT.
As such, the use of this team score may be rather a blunt measure.
In addition, use of this Framingham score allows the incorporation of diabetes status at each assessment the a priori major outcome of the DPP.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com