Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(18)
First, the use of the propensity score method may be quite useful in reducing selection bias between self and proxy respondents in survey research.
As stated in The Art of War, the ability to make opportune use of the propensity of things means that is possible to avoid confrontation.
I was our intention that use of the propensity score would control for these biases.
Differences between self and proxy-completed responses were substantially reduced with the use of the propensity score method.
Matching by use of the propensity scores produced a sample of 840 patients (420 in each phase).
The use of the propensity score technique provides a way, in non-randomized studies, to control for pretreatment differences by defining sets of comparable patients.
Similar(42)
Because we could not find any study comparing different uses of the propensity score in this context, we included all four commonly used propensity score methods, ie, matching, stratification, weighting, and covariate adjustment.
For example, Robins and colleagues [32] proposed the use of the inverse propensity score to weigh a regression model, offering in this way additional protection against misspecification.
The R package of MatchIt was used for the propensity score analysis [ 21].
This increase in risk persisted despite application of several distinct techniques to identify and account for potentially confounding characteristics of patients and hospitals that might affect the selection of agent for stress ulcer prophylaxis, including the use of propensity score stratification, propensity score matching, and instrumental variable analysis.
Once a data set had been randomly generated, we constructed a series of matched samples using 2 different matching methods: nearest-neighbor matching using the logit of the propensity score and nearest-neighbor matching within specified calipers using the logit of the propensity score.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com