Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
The professionals were evaluated according three criteria: correct use of PPE; proper fit of PPE in the face ("Seal check"); EPI and conditioning.
There is a gap between being aware of hazards and PPE (90%) and use of PPE (47%) at work.
The use of PPE included the percentage of time that the subjects wore PPE and the type of PPE (i.e., earplugs and earmuffs) used at work.
In contrast, in terms of using PPE at work, welders who have been working for a longer duration report more use of PPE.
Almost half of the farmers (49.5%) showed unsafe behaviour in the use of PPE.
Moreover, the current applications of technologies such as RFID have not guaranteed the proper use of PPE on site.
Nasopharyngeal aspiration procedures (NPA) are well known to be high-risk procedures for which use of PPE is necessary.
Factors related to the use of PPE during handling of PPPs were explored in a survey of cotton farmers in northern Greece.
The survey data revealed 80% of transilluminators units had some type of engineering control designed into the unit and over 75% compliance with the use of PPE.
Reducing nosocomial transmission with the use of PPE is unquestionably fundamental to maintain medical infrastructure and to implement case isolation.
There is also a need for education on the use of PPE during pesticides application to avoid exposure and health hazards.
More suggestions(7)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com