Experimental results indicate that N is least sensitive and L is most sensitive, therefore, we focused on a series of experiments using a variety of different window L lengths L and decision-making instances K.
The use of three different window sizes facilitates classifying the surrounding of potential binding sites as background.
Strengths of this study include the comparative use of three different windows to evaluate changes in IVC diameters, the observation of a sample larger than in previous studies and the recording of time from end of donation to post-bleeding assessment.
These include the use of different insulation materials and windows as well as the installation of solar panels.
The three mappings Std, Smt-LF, and Smt-MF use different window lengths of 128, 512, and 512, respectively, for their processing algorithms.
To maximize sensitivity we decided, after preliminary testing with Salmonella data, on two variations of the same algorithm, using two different window periods.
The time consumed during processing of the EEGs using different window lengths is presented in Table 7.
In addition, I used three different window sizes (31 bp, 41 bp, and 51 bp) of the sliding window for smoothing the spatial distributions of the TFBSs.
The sensitivity of the relative performance of the different algorithms was tested by using different window periods (8 or 24 weeks) of effectiveness of possible intervention methods.
The largest prevalence was found after redemptions of more than one type of SSRI in the exposure window, and simultaneous use of different SSRIs or change in type of SSRI during early pregnancy might be problematic.
