Sentence examples for use of cost benefit from inspiring English sources

The use of cost benefit analysis to support environmental policy will always be limited by ethical questions on the distribution of benefits and costs among sectors, income groups, locations, and generations.

There is growing interest in the use of cost benefit analysis for the evaluation environmental interventions aimed at reducing the health damage associated with health pollution.

Her Majesty's Treasury recommends the use of cost-benefit analysis for policy decisions, with economic valuation techniques for things that don't have prices associated with them.

Indeed, the court reversed one of her decisions in Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, the case that involved the use of cost-benefit analysis by the environmental agency.

Alex Matthiessen, the president of Riverkeeper, an environmental group, said in a statement that Wednesday's ruling in the case, Entergy Corporation v. Riverkeeper, No.07-588, allowed but did not require the use of cost-benefit analysis.

Jerry Taylor, director of natural resource studies with the Cato Institute, a libertarian research group, said the agency could "make better use of cost-benefit analyses" and of scientific review and leave more decisions to the states and localities.

The judges have done that through the use of cost-benefit analysis — or more specifically by a willingness to find that the S.E.C. failed to do enough to quantify even minor costs.

John D. Graham, who oversaw the use of cost-benefit analysis during the George W. Bush administration, said that the scientific justification was "quite strong" for raising the values used by the Transportation Department, but he cautioned that the E.P.A. was going too far.

The use of cost-benefit reviews for recommendation evaluations is also highlighted.

Sagoff's distinction between people as consumers and people as citizens was intended to blunt the use of cost-benefit analysis as the final arbiter in discussions about nature's value.

These estimates of absenteeism and the range of year-to-year variation should be a valuable contribution to the study of the economic burden of influenza and of potential use to cost-benefit analyses of workplace vaccination programs.