Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(5)
Approximately 10% of the variance in students' use of competitive learning was attributable to countries.
Therefore, for students across the countries, increased use of competitive learning was associated with improved mathematics performance, even though effect sizes were small.
Students' use of competitive learning followed the order of the USA, Hong Kong, Korea, and Japan, with each statistically significantly different from all others either (statistically significantly) more or (statistically significantly) less.
Such competitive spirit is clearly manifested in the learning of mathematics as American students championed the use of competitive learning among all students in the four countries (Table 1).
Specifically, one SD increase in the use of competitive learning would be associated with an increase in mathematics performance by about 11 points in Hong Kong, about 8 points in Japan, about 24 points in Korea, and about 8 points in the USA.
Similar(54)
Weight training uses a form of competitive learning.
Using the principle of competitive learning, the Euclidean distance to all weight vectors is calculated for each sample, and the cluster with the most similar weight vector is called the best matching unit (BMU).
The novel learning algorithm proposed has the main features of competitive learning, automatic generation of the network structure and binary representation of the connection strengths (weights).
Similar to the case of competitive learning, a pattern occurs in which American students lead the way in cooperative learning of mathematics but fall behind in using cooperative learning for improved mathematics performance.
This is achieved by the use of a competitive learning neural network that employs a frequency sensitive competitive learning mechanism to adaptively design the quantizer.
The findings are all situated in the backdrop that American students championed the use of both competitive learning and cooperative learning.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com