"use of argumentation" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It refers to the act of using reasoning and evidence to support a claim or viewpoint. You can use it in various contexts, such as academic writing, debates, or discussions. Here is an example sentence: "The use of argumentation is essential in writing persuasive essays as it allows the writer to present a strong and convincing case for their stance."
I am especially interested in studying the use of argumentation and the engineering design process as a basis for science teaching and learning.
To criticize the positions of others but not to venture to state a position of one's own was regarded by the Indian debate tradition as a substandard use of argumentation called vitaṇḍā, which literally means making an attack.
Describing these transitivity choices or grammatical patterns does not seem to be sufficient, however, since any excerpt may include various implicit elements or other inferences, based on shared knowledge, that can only be elucidated through the use of argumentation theory.
These findings support our suggestion that instructional design and practice can substantially influence student use of argumentation.
First, they show that the use of argumentation in medical encounters can build bridges between doctors and patients.
Finally, instructors and peer coaches alike would benefit from working together to explore ways to generate a classroom environment that focuses on deep understanding of content through the explicit use of argumentation and reasoning.
It seemed to me that many of these uses of argumentation were inspired by (of ten inspired) guesswork, and that a great majority of the AI community were unaware that there was a maturing, rich field of research in Argumentation Theory (and Critical Thinking and Informal Logic) that had been steadily re building a scholarly approach to the area over the previous twenty years or so.
Medical uses of argumentation vary from systems that provide advice on administering drugs (Hurt et al., 2003), to those that help clinicians plan the management of chronic illness through the provision of decision support (Glasspool et al., 2006).
This paper proposes the use of an argumentation framework with recursive attacks to address a trust model in a collaborative open multi-agent system.
Besides the particular topics he discussed, Kilvington's extensive use of sophisma argumentation, his mathematization of ethics and theology, and his frequent use of hypothetical (secundum imaginationem) cases, place his thought in the mainstream of fourteenth-century English philosophy and theology.
(iii) In dealing with methods of traditional rhetoric, Aristotle obviously assumes that even methods that have traditionally been used instead of argumentation can be refined so that they support the aim of an argumentative style of rhetoric.
