Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
But according to a person briefed on the appeal, Sherman's argument was based on "slam-dunk facts" and, as in the case of the baseball player Ryan Braun, on a procedural argument: that the chain of custody of his urine sample was broken, negating the test result.
Sherman appealed the suspension, arguing that the chain of custody of his urine sample was broken, and won.
Similar(58)
But a urine sample from the horse tested positive for a banned substance, and a second urine sample was stolen.
His urine sample was then divided into A and B samples.
His urine sample was found to contain 10 times the acceptable limit of nandrolone.
But she added that the urine sample was ''not consistent with such a claim''.
Each urine sample was assayed for UFC and creatinine.
My first impression was that catching Kobe's urine sample was going to be difficult.
Braun's lawyers argued that his urine sample was not handled correctly, according to multiple reports.
Each urine sample is divided into an A sample and a B sample for testing purposes.
When an athlete is tested for drugs, the urine sample is put in two containers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com