Exact(8)
All subjects recognized without hesitation the Upright stimulus as a human model.
These results were significant only for subjects who viewed the Upright stimulus prior to the Inverted one (group Up-first).
Nine subjects viewed the Upright stimulus first (group Up-first) and nine viewed the Inverted stimulus first (group Inv-first).
However, all observers identified the Upright stimulus as a human model in postural imbalance indicating that kinematic information, rather than the visual context, is tuning motion recognition [22].
To sum up, we found an increase of subjects' body sway when they observed the Upright stimulus as compared with Inverted and Control ones.
Nevertheless, the Upright stimulus predominantly affected observers' posture along the antero-posterior axis, that is the axis along which the model mainly oscillated.
Similar(51)
Why might we see stronger evidence for holistic processing for inverted stimuli relative to upright stimuli?
The data constrain models of holistic processing by demonstrating that latent fingerprint experts and novices may not substantively differ in terms of the amount of holistic processing and that inverted stimuli actually produced more evidence for holistic processing than upright stimuli.
Participants responded more accurately (F 1,13) = 8.02, p<.01) to upright stimuli.
Participants responded faster (F 1,13) = 44.68, p<.001) to upright stimuli.
Response latencies for inverted and for upright stimuli did not differ significantly (F 1,13) = 0.11, ns).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com