Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Waist circumference (cm) was measured at the umbilicus level with the subject standing and at the narrowest point between the lower border of the rib cage and the uppermost border of the iliac crest during normal expiration.
Waist circumference was measured placing the measuring tape around the patient's abdomen (the patient should be standing with his arms separated from his core) between the uppermost border of the iliac crest and the lower border of the costal margin.
Similar(57)
Standing WC was measured just above the uppermost lateral border of the ilium.
Waist circumference was measured at the uppermost lateral border of the ilium.
Waist circumference was measured just above the uppermost lateral border of the right ileum using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey protocol (13).
Waist circumference was measured at the point of minimal circumference at the level of the uppermost lateral border of the right iliac crest at minimal respiration.
Waist circumference (WC, cm) was measured at the level midway between the twelfth rib and the uppermost lateral border of the iliac crest during normal expiration.
Height was measured using a stadiometer, weight was measured on an electronic or beam balance scale, and waist circumference was measured at the level of the uppermost lateral border of the right iliac crest using an anthropometric measuring tape.
Measurements are made in duplicate at 3 different locations – uppermost lateral border of the iliac crest, midpoint between the lower margin of the last palpable rip and the top of the iliac crest, and 4 cm above the umbilicus.
In order to assess body fat distribution, specifically central adiposity, waist circumference (WC) is measured to the nearest 0.1 cm at 2 sites (the uppermost lateral border of the iliac crest, and the midpoint between the last floating rib and the top of the iliac crest) [ 38].
MUAC was measured at the mid-point between the uppermost edge of the posterior border of the acromion process and the tip of the olecranon process.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com