Sentence examples for upper and lower premolars from inspiring English sources

There is a complete set of teeth in early artiodactyls and in modern pigs of the genus Sus, consisting on each side of three upper and lower incisors, an upper and lower canine, four upper and lower premolars, and three upper and lower molars.

These observations are in contrast with the pattern of biofilm distribution found in our orthodontic patients, where the upper lateral incisors and upper canines generally had more biofilm accumulation than the upper and lower premolars and the maxillary arch accumulated more biofilm than the mandibular arch.

Because the ancestors of P. raceyi lost the first upper incisor and first and third upper and lower premolars, the upper incisors are designated I2 and I3 and the premolars are designated P2 and P4 (uppers) and p2 and p4 (lowers).

The dental formula of slow lorises is, meaning that on each side of the mouth there are two upper (maxillary) and lower (mandibular) incisors, one upper and lower canine tooth, three upper and lower premolars, and three upper and lower molars, giving a total of 36 permanent teeth.

Similarly, for Transbond Bond XT™, there were significant differences between both upper and lower premolars and also between upper and lower molars (P < 0.001).

for Transbond Bond XT™, there were significant differences between both the upper and lower premolars and the upper and lower molars.

When they scored Ida and Afradapis against those other primates, Seiffert and colleagues found that adapids do share some traits with anthropoids, such as the loss of a third upper and lower premolar.

Although increasing with age, the mean number of missing teeth in the upper and lower premolar regions is almost similar for all ages.

Significant differences were also found in SBS between the upper and lower centrals, the upper and lower premolar teeth, and the upper and lower molar teeth for Light Bond™ in the present study, when the same tooth type in the upper and lower arch was compared.

In particular, mesiodistal tip on the upper molars and lower premolars were achieved with the most predictability (93.4 and 96.7%, respectively), while rotation on the lower canines was the least efficaciously achieved (54.2%).

The least predictable movement was rotation of the lower canines (54.2%), while the most predictable movements were mesiodistal tipping of the upper molars and lower premolars (respectively 93.4 and 96.7%).