upheld with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "upheld with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct preposition would be "by" or "through" depending on the context. Example: "The law was upheld by the Supreme Court."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

34 human-written examples

But which "European values" are best upheld with barbed wire and fences, regulations, harassment and attacks?

The Guardian - Opinion

Arsenal's appeals were therefore upheld, with the pair available for Tuesday's visit of Swansea to the Emirates Stadium.

The Guardian - Sport

While Barake's conviction was quashed on appeal, Ibrahim's was upheld with a reduced sentence of six months.

The Guardian

Still, others contend that the market for sovereign debt may be improved if the judge's ruling is upheld, with the sanction on payments banks mostly intact.

The New York Times

This is stewardship of a natural resource upheld with unswerving belief and sensitivity for the balance between careful exploitation and preservation for the future.

The Guardian

The Web site Retrosheet.org has tried to put together a list of all games in which a protest was upheld, with play resuming at the point of the protest, and has identified 14.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

26 human-written examples

It's difficult to see what social good the state is upholding with its legal action.

The New York Times

It's unclear how much of this is Mr. Stapleton and how much is high-lonesome traditionalism, which the SteelDrivers uphold with vigorous fondness.

The New York Times - Arts

At the very least, it upholds with admirable panache a cuisine that is fading away as fast if not faster than Yiddish.

The New Yorker

At the very least, it upholds with admirable panache a cuisine that is fading away as fast if not faster than Yiddish.<\/p> Two recent meals began with an amuse-bouche: bite-size cubes of a warm, eggy, oniony casserole presented as \u201cmatzo babka,\u201d a study in the Jewish art of making something delicious out of the world\u2019s most tasteless cracker.

The New Yorker

Such an evolution is the result of intense and complex ongoing ties that migrants uphold with their country of origin and the cultural, social, economic, political and ideological transfers that occur between the departure and the receiving country and beyond.

Comparative Migration Studies

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of "upheld with", consider using phrases like "supported by", "maintained through", or "enforced by" to ensure grammatical accuracy and clarity. For instance, "The decision was supported by evidence" is more appropriate.

Common error

A common mistake is using "with" after "upheld". It's more grammatically sound to use "by" or "through". Avoid saying "The law was upheld with the court's decision". Instead, say "The law was upheld by the court's decision".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "upheld with" functions as a verb phrase followed by a preposition, but according to Ludwig AI, it's often grammatically incorrect. It attempts to describe how something is supported or maintained, but it requires a more precise preposition for clarity and correctness.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Reference

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "upheld with" appears in various contexts, particularly in news and scientific articles, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI highlights that a more appropriate preposition, such as "by" or "through", should be used instead. Better alternatives include "supported by", "maintained through", or "enforced by", ensuring clarity and grammatical accuracy. Therefore, writers should avoid using "upheld with" in formal or professional writing to prevent potential errors. The frequency of this phrase is common due to its incorrect use, as highlighted by Ludwig.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

supported by

Indicates that something is sustained or validated by something else.

maintained through

Emphasizes the method or means by which something is sustained.

sustained by

Indicates that something is kept in existence or maintained by something else.

enforced by

Focuses on the active imposition or implementation of something.

validated by

Highlights the confirmation or authentication of something's correctness.

corroborated by

Emphasizes the strengthening or confirmation of something with additional evidence.

justified by

Suggests that something is shown to be right or reasonable by providing evidence.

bolstered by

Implies that something is strengthened or supported, often in a defensive manner.

substantiated by

Highlights that something is proven true with evidence.

reinforced with

Indicates that something is strengthened or supported by adding another element.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "upheld with" in a sentence?

Replace "upheld with" with more grammatically correct alternatives such as "supported by", "maintained through", or "enforced by" depending on the intended meaning.

Is "upheld with" grammatically correct?

No, "upheld with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct preposition to use is often "by" or "through". It is better to use phrases like "supported by" or "maintained through".

Which is the more appropriate phrase: "upheld with" or "upheld by"?

"Upheld by" is the more appropriate and grammatically correct phrase. For example, "The decision was upheld by the court" is correct, while "upheld with" is not.

What does it mean when something is described as "upheld by" something else?

When something is "upheld by" something else, it means it is supported, maintained, or validated by that thing. For example, a legal decision might be upheld by a higher court, meaning the higher court supports the original decision.