"upgraded quality" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to a product or service that has improved in its quality compared to the original version. For example, "This new version of the software has an upgraded quality that makes it easier to use."
The upgraded quality is due in part to the engineering alliances that auto makers have formed with stereo manufacturers.
The camera on the iPhone 4S, also known as an iSight camera, can take 8-megapixel photos (3,264 by 2,448 pixels) and record 1080p videos at up to 30 frames per second with upgraded quality (30% better clarity, 26% better white balance, color accuracy) due to an additional lens, IR filter, a wider f/2.4 aperture, and Image signal processor (built-in A5).
The potential of using the biogas as energy source has long been widely recognised and current techniques are being developed to upgrade quality and to enhance energy use.
Every increase in the property tax rates on structures (not land) reduces the desirability of putting capital funds into new buildings, creates an incentive against upgrading quality by new construction, and discourages maintenance.
Innovation – understood broadly to mean all types of learning: learning how to produce new products, how to reduce costs, how to upgrade quality, how to manage an organization – is a key driver of industrial development.
Further developments to upgrade quality are also being studied.
–Problem Recovery: helping resolve and compensate for problems, upgrading quality and ensuring complete satisfaction.
--Problem resolvey: helping resolve and compensate for problems, upgrading quality and ensuring complete satisfaction.
Finding appropriate methods to decrease ash content of coal tailing is essential for upgrading quality of products.
They had a Japanese invasion on their own soil just like the U.S. did and had to upgrade quality just like the Big Three in order to survive.
The unique features of GRADE include: (1) explicit, comprehensive criteria for downgrading and upgrading quality of evidence ratings; (2) explicit evaluation of the importance of outcomes and (3) clear separation of quality of evidence from the strength of recommendations.
