Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Other broad barriers identified (moderate to serious) included: limited funding and resources (72/100; 72%); reviewer motivation (53/96; 55%); limited academic credit for updating work (49/100; 49%); limited publishing formats (35/100; 35%) and having to update reviews done by others (35/99; 35%).
Failure to update reviews soon enough may cause decision makers to act on out-of-date information.
The CDSR does, however, provide a unique opportunity to investigate this process due to the Cochrane Collaboration's policy to update reviews every two years.
This update reviews specifically the evidence on the effects of beta-2 agonists in human ALI and in models of ALI.
We report the number of citations that reviewers would have needed to screen, had they been using the proposed semiautomated system to update reviews in 2010, versus the number of citations they actually screened.
The most frequently cited reasons for not undertaking a Cochrane review were: lack of time (78%), the need to undergo specific Cochrane training (46%), unwillingness to update reviews (36%), difficulties with the Cochrane process (26%) and the review topic already registered with the Cochrane Collaboration (21%).
Similar(53)
Update: Review!
In this special issue, an update review of the mechanism and treatment of CV and DCI after aneurysmal SAH is presented.
Update, review, and maintain records and action plans.
I'll also be giving updates, reviews and reactions throughout the festival on the Guardian site and Twitter – here's to another excellent year!
Both updated meta-analyses and new comparisons were present in 46% (35/76) of the updated reviews.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com