up to standard

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "up to standard" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it to indicate that something meets a certain level of quality or expectation. Example: The final report was not up to standard and required revisions. Alternative expressions include "meets expectations" and "up to par."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Older collection descriptions and indexes are not up to standard.

Harvard University

Are my schools and hospitals up to standard?

The Guardian - Opinion

We requested remedial work to bring it up to standard.

Independent

Inspectors found that the plant could not ensure that drugs produced there were up to standard.

The Washington Post

His rants when a film isn't up to standard are one of the show's delights.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Those who do will move up to standard," said a justice ministry source.

The Guardian

"When it works up to standard, we'll be delighted to accept it," he said.

The New York Times

"We have a road that isn't even up to standard now," she said.

The New York Times

Erring homeowners are asked by the architectural committee to bring their homes up to standard.

The New York Times - Arts

Andrew says he believes her mother thinks he is not up to standard for her family.

The New Yorker

The visual gags are up to standard, too: often very simple, sometimes classic.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When evaluating something against a standard, be specific about what standard you are referencing. For example: "The product's performance was not "up to standard" according to the industry benchmark."

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "up to standard" without providing context or quantifiable measures. Instead of saying "The service was not "up to standard"," specify what aspects were lacking and how they fell short of expectations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "up to standard" functions as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun, indicating whether something meets a particular level of quality or requirement. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Academia

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

8%

Wiki

6%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "up to standard" is a commonly used adjective phrase to describe something that meets a required level of quality or performance. It is grammatically correct and suitable for various contexts, ranging from news reports to academic papers. The primary contexts where it is used include News & Media, Academia, and Formal & Business. Ludwig AI validates the use of this phrase. When employing this phrase, ensure you provide sufficient context and specific measures to avoid vagueness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

meets the criteria

Emphasizes adherence to a specific set of requirements or benchmarks.

satisfactory

A general term indicating that something is acceptable or good enough.

acceptable quality

Focuses specifically on the quality aspect being sufficient.

at the required level

Highlights the fulfillment of a necessary performance or achievement benchmark.

measures up

An idiomatic expression indicating that something compares favorably.

good enough

Indicates a minimal level of acceptance, implying it barely meets requirements.

in compliance

Focuses on adherence to regulations or standards, particularly in formal contexts.

of the right caliber

Suggests something possesses the necessary level of skill or expertise.

of sufficient grade

Emphasizes that something is of an adequate quality or rank.

passes muster

An informal expression indicating that something has been approved or accepted after scrutiny.

FAQs

How can I use "up to standard" in a sentence?

You can use "up to standard" to describe something that meets the required level of quality or performance. For example: "The quality of the work was not "up to standard", so we had to redo it."

What are some alternatives to saying "up to standard"?

Alternatives to "up to standard" include "meets the criteria", "satisfactory", or "acceptable quality". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "up to standard" or "meets expectations"?

Both "up to standard" and "meets expectations" are valid, but "up to standard" implies adherence to a specific, often measurable, benchmark, while "meets expectations" is more general and subjective.

What does it mean for something to be "not up to standard"?

If something is "not up to standard", it means it fails to meet the minimum requirements or expected level of quality. This could refer to anything from product quality to service performance.