unsupported by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "unsupported by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something lacks support, evidence, or backing from a particular source or authority. Example: "The claims made in the report were unsupported by any credible evidence."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It is unsupported by the facts.

The New Yorker

"Allegations otherwise are unsupported by the facts".

The New York Times

Such passages are unsupported by citation.

The New York Times - Books

I felt unsupported by the science.

The New Yorker

This, too, is a belief unsupported by the data.

The New Yorker

This assertion is unsupported by any data or reputable study.

The Economist

Although intriguing, such historical traditions are unsupported by evidence.

Encyclopedia Britannica

That charge is completely unsupported by the evidence.

The New York Times

They are also, as yet, unsupported by much substance.

The Economist

Unsupported by the CNT, the revolution was quickly suppressed.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"The hypotheses and presumptions in the report were unsupported by evidence.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "unsupported by", ensure you clearly state what lacks support and from what source or evidence. For example, "The claim is unsupported by scientific evidence."

Common error

Don't use "unsupported by" as a blanket dismissal without specifying the type of support lacking. Be specific about whether it's data, evidence, expert opinion, or another form of validation that is absent.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "unsupported by" functions as a prepositional phrase that typically modifies a noun or clause, indicating that something lacks the necessary evidence, justification, or backing. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

69%

Science

12%

Encyclopedias

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "unsupported by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate a lack of evidence or backing for a statement or claim. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It appears most often in news and media, scientific, and encyclopedic contexts, reflecting its value in formal discourse where evidence and validation are key. When employing this phrase, clarity and specificity regarding the type of support lacking are crucial. Alternative phrases like "lacking evidence for" or "not backed by" can be used to express similar meanings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacking evidence for

Replaces "unsupported" with "lacking evidence", focusing on the absence of proof.

without foundation in

Emphasizes the absence of a solid basis or justification.

not substantiated by

Highlights the lack of verification or confirmation of a claim or statement.

unconfirmed by

Focuses on the absence of confirmation, particularly from an authority or reliable source.

not backed by

Indicates a lack of endorsement or approval from a particular source or group.

unjustified by

Highlights that there are no justifiable reasons.

without support from

Directly states that there is no backing or assistance.

not corroborated by

Focuses on the lack of independent confirmation or validation.

unvalidated by

Highlights the absence of a formal validation process or result.

unverified by

Indicates the absence of confirmation about accuracy or truth.

FAQs

How can I use "unsupported by" in a sentence?

Use "unsupported by" to indicate a lack of evidence or validation for a claim or statement. For example, "The theory is "unsupported by data"".

What is a good alternative to "unsupported by"?

Alternatives include phrases like "lacking evidence for", "not backed by", or "without foundation in", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "unsupported by evidence" or "not supported by evidence"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct and convey similar meanings. "Unsupported by evidence" may sound slightly more formal or assertive.

What's the difference between "unsupported by facts" and "unsupported by evidence"?

"Unsupported by facts" indicates a claim contradicts known or established facts. "Unsupported by evidence" suggests there's a general lack of proof or substantiation, not necessarily a direct contradiction.