Sentence examples for unsuitable image from inspiring English sources

The next card depicts an older boy apparently showing a younger child an unsuitable image he has downloaded on to a smartphone.

When Herz becomes obsessed with a new neighbour, things get worse: 'Unsuitable images presented themselves, and were briefly but furtively enjoyed.' Just when a person is (face it) laying hands on his own person, the sentence takes refuge in impersonality.

Cases without NBI-ME images or with only unsuitable images (blurry or unfocused) were excluded from this study.

% of samples Water class S1 <10 1–25 100 Excellent S2 10 18 – – Good S3 18 26 – – Permissible S4 >26 – – Unsuitable Open image in new window Fig. 8 The distribution of SAR values in the study area.

Table 5 Classification of groundwater based on SAR (Todd 1980; Richards 1954) SAR Suitability for irrigation Number of samples percentage pre-monsoon Number of samples percentage-Post-monsoon 0 10 Excellent 92 83 10 18 Good 6.8 13.5 18–26 Permissible 1 1.1 >26 Unsuitable 1 2.2 Open image in new window Fig. 15 Classification of irrigation water based on sodium hazard and salinity hazard.

Table 8 Irrigation water quality based on SSP (after Todd 1995) Water class SSP values % compliance Dry Wet Excellent <60 100%100%0 % Good to permissible 60 75 – – Doubtful to unsuitable >75 – – Open image in new window Fig. 7 SAR vs SSP for irrigation water.

Table 7 Suitability for irrigation based on Na% Na% Suitability for irrigation Percentage <20 Excellent Nil 20 40 Good 11.5 40 60 Permissible 29.5 60 80 Doubtful 52.6 >80 Unsuitable 6.4 Open image in new window Fig. 6 Suitability of groundwater for irrigation based on EC and sodium percent.

Table 9 Suitability for irrigation based on SAR SAR (meq/l) Suitability for irrigation Percentage <10 Excellent 96.2 10 18 Good 3.8 18–26 Doubtful Nil >26 Unsuitable Nil Open image in new window Fig. 7 Suitability of groundwater for irrigation based on salinity and alkalinity hazard.

Table 7 Irrigation water quality based on SAR (after Karanth 1987) Water class SAR values % compliance Dry Wet Excellent <10 100%100%0 % Good 10 18 – – Doubtful 18 26 – – Unsuitable >26 – – Open image in new window Fig. 6 a USSL classification of groundwater of the study area (dry).

The agar-coated plates, unlike the ULA plates, proved unsuitable for automated image analysis on the Celigo cytometer (probably due to variations in the thickness of agar in each well).

When M-mode images were unsuitable for measurement, 2-dimensional images were used.