Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
FPs as consultants, however, will not detect if there are unsatisfactory grounds for relying on DNs.
Several FPs talked about, e.g., nurses who were short-term substitutes and lacked a DN's formal training as one reason for unsatisfactory grounds for relying on the DNs.
FPs as consultants, however, are not aware of problematic conditions for medical treatment as they do not get information and are not alerted to problems when there are unsatisfactory grounds for relying on the DNs in the medical treatment.
Likewise the conditions for providing medical treatment are problematic when there are unsatisfactory grounds for relying on the DN in medical treatment irrespective of the role of the FP.
If FPs rely on the initiative of the DNs, unaware of the unsatisfactory grounds for relying on the DN, the home care patients will be left without proper support for their medical treatment.
However, if FPs choose to be consultants in situations when there are unsatisfactory grounds for relying on the DNs in the medical treatment the consultant will not be able to identify the situation as problematic as the DNs will not provide the FP with information, or involve the FP in the care and treatment.
Similar(53)
Mrs. Clinton said while four State Department officials were removed from their posts and placed on administrative leave, they were not otherwise disciplined because under "federal statute and regulations, unsatisfactory leadership is not grounds for finding a breach of duty".
In the role of conductor, the FP will identify when the grounds for relying on the DN are unsatisfactory and be able to take action, but in the role of consultant the FP will not detect this, leaving home care patients without appropriate support.
Conditions for medical treatment are described as good enough when there are satisfactory grounds for relying on the DN and as problematic when they are unsatisfactory, regardless of the role of the FPs.
Their grounds for suspicion?
Grounds for scepticism are plentiful.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com