Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The reasons for spectacles renewal as used in this study referred to spectacle's or patient's or prescriber's related factors as documented in the case records that led to 'sub-optimal' or unsatisfactory correction of refractive errors.
VA = visual acuity, VARE = visual acuity right eye, VALE = visual acuity left eye, PL = perception of light VA = visual acuity, PL = perception of light The reasons why patients sought renewal of their spectacles due to 'sub-optimal' or unsatisfactory correction of refractive errors were mostly spectacles related among others (Table 4).
Similar(55)
But if the position is unsatisfactory, small corrections are possible without complete disruption of the pseudarthrosis.
However, applying the same factors to images obtained in subsequent months produced results that were quite unsatisfactory and additional correction factors, varying from image to image, were definitely required.
Whatever the reasons, this is unsatisfactory and needs correction.
This unsatisfactory effect of field correction may be attributed to the irregular pattern of ocular aberrations near the PA.
This method can be unforgiving and any under or over-correction can lead to an unsatisfactory result [12, 14, 23].
We would recommend comb-p for DMR finding in cases where the effect size is very small – such as, for example, where no differential probes with P<0.05 are returned by limma after BH correction – and if DMRcate's output is unsatisfactory.
However, the high frequency of pseudarthrosis, ineffective correction of kyphosis and maintenance of the correction, and unsatisfactory neurological function overwhelm its advantages.
These unsatisfactory results can be attributed to both the conservative nature of Bonferroni correction and the accuracy of motif presence as a proxy for regulation.
Patients with satisfactory functional results had a mean correction of Bohler's angle by 93.1% compared to those with unsatisfactory results where correction averaged 85.3% (P = 0.12).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com