Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "unsafe for consumption" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to describe something that is not safe or suitable to be eaten or drank. Example: "The FDA has issued a warning that this product may be unsafe for consumption due to potential contamination."
Exact(10)
Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou's cabinet gave the green light to resume shipments of U.S. beef laced with ractopamine, a meat leanness-enhancing drug that Taiwan deems unsafe for consumption, sparking protests in Taipei.
This renders food unsafe for consumption or causes rapid spoilage.
The other, found in premise 1, 2, and 3, concerns the underlying biological processes, i.e., the plant being safe or unsafe for consumption.
This marks the first time since 1969 the FDA has declared a food additive unsafe for consumption.
In 1907, New York specialists claimed ice from the Hudson River to be unsafe for consumption and potentially containing typhoid germs; the report was successfully challenged by the natural ice industry, but public opinion was turning against natural ice on safety grounds.
The water is unsafe for consumption.
Similar(50)
(Clams from the bay are considered unsafe for human consumption).
Yet I find it difficult to sleep at night knowing that my children have consumed water that has been deemed by New York State unsafe for human consumption.
European consumers have protested what they call "frankenfoods" and have said that American multinationals cannot force them to accept a product they consider unsafe for human consumption or for the environment.
For those who had stopped eating it, the reasons given were a combination of the ethical implications as well as recent evidence showing that a percentage of shark fins assessed from five Chinese cities (including Hong Kong), contained mercury and methylmercury in concentrations high enough to be considered unsafe for human consumption.
Where once we had to pay £4 a month for a magazine where maybe one feature appealed, and a questionable photo-shoot made it unsafe for public consumption, now we can pay £8 a year for issues guaranteed to cater for our interests, without having to deal with potential public ridicule or private shame.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com