Sentence examples for univocally from inspiring English sources

His doctrine of analogy, according to which statements about God are true analogically rather than univocally, was likewise inspired by Aristotle, as were his distinctions between act and potency, essence and existence, substance and accidents, and the active and passive intellect and his view of the soul as the "form" of the body.

In its attitude toward its characters and toward sex, "I Am Love" is a vapid and demagogic entertainment, a work of mere and minor sensation that drums its subjects vulgarly and univocally.

In other words, if you think you're entitled to be simply and univocally happy, any deviation from planned perfection may result in grievous complaints; those who never had much hope for anything may express contentment with a seemingly bad lot.

Social utility maxima cannot be calculated univocally.

And a field theory like general relativity can do this because the infinitesimal metric interval the careful way to think about separation in general relativistic spacetime is invariant (hence univocally determined) under all continuous coordinate transformations.

According to some philosophers, there are also individual essences, essential properties that characterize individuals univocally (Plantinga 1974).

He says in this case that the one science falls under the other univocally, since both are said to deal with proportion.

Unfortunately, these symbols are not used univocally by physicists and philosophers.

In general, a Platonic Form F differs from an individual F thing in that F may be predicated univocally of the Form: The Form F is F.

According to Thomas Aquinas, transcendental being extends only to created being, whereas Henry of Ghent and Meister Eckhart formulate a doctrine of the transcendentals in which God is the first known; Duns Scotus, finally, makes transcendental being indifferent to finite and infinite being; it is univocally common to God and creature.

The main difference between the two authors is that Scotus believes we can apply certain predicates univocally with exactly the same meaning to God and creatures, whereas Aquinas insists that this is impossible, and that we can only use analogical predication, in which a word as applied to God has a meaning different from, although related to, the meaning of that same word as applied to creatures.