Sentence examples for universal inference from inspiring English sources

More recently objective Bayesianism has taken on the traditional problem of the justification of universal inference.

Further, what do we relate in inference: universals with universals, universals with a particular, or a particular with a particular?

The three of these come together (though the latter two are predominant) within the epistemological traditions in an almost universal regard of inference as a knowledge source.

Methodological incommensurability (§4.1 above) denies that there are universal methods for making inferences from the data.

The object of the former is the pure particular (svalakshana), and the object of the latter (he regarded judgments as containing elements of inference) is the universal (samanyalakshana).

The validity of inferential knowledge was challenged on the ground that all inference requires a universal major premise ("All that possesses smoke possesses fire") whereas there is no means of arriving at a certainty about such a proposition.

This paper defines a formal inference rule of universal attachment and discusses the properties of soundness, completeness and correctness for this rule.

This insensitivity suggests that the fitness ranking depends primarily on a more universal quantity on which the inference algorithm builds.

If this turns out to be difficult, the inference of a universal gene regulatory network for a broad range of cell types from just, say, expression data without detailed knowledge of actual TF binding in each cell type might be impossible.

Universals are thus essential to inference, and for this reason Hume's account of inference in terms of the association of ideas collapses: Humean ideas are particulars, fleeting episodes which cannot be revived by association.

Conversion yields an equivalent proposition (and is hence a valid inference) in general only with so-called E and I propositions (universal negatives and particular affirmatives).