Sentence examples for unequal prevalence from inspiring English sources

Many diseases are typified by an unequal prevalence in females and males [ 1].

Further studies are needed to examine possible explanations for the unequal prevalence of functional limitations by education level.

Based on this fact, it is hypothesized that different risk of stroke incidence by education level could be one of the possible mechanisms for unequal prevalence of functional limitations by education level.

Low educational levels has been associated with cognitive impairment [ 10], unhealthy behaviors [ 9], and history of falling [ 11], which lead a hypothesis that unequal prevalence of physical functional limitation by education level could exist in Japan.

Without them, equal achievement levels could give the impression of equity in care when there might actually be inequity (e.g., equal blood pressure measurement rates in different ethnic groups might indicate an inequity in health care because of unequal prevalence of hypertension between the groups).

The effect of the unequal smoking prevalence between the gender groups was also verified after performing another modeling excluding the smoking prevalence which showed corresponding gender stratified exposure-disease associations with the overall RR (Additional file 2).

It's about demanding change to the systematic prevalence of unequal power relations between men and women.

One explanation is the unequal distribution of smoking prevalence amongst these two groups in Oman [ 15, 16].

Nevertheless, the Iranian primary health care has been concerned to address the high prevalence and unequal distribution of under-nutrition among children.

Given two motifs of equal prevalence and unequal motif conservation, the motif discovery algorithm will tend to discover the motif with the higher energy (equivalently, the higher motif conservation).

While under most circumstances a Cohen's kappa value would suffice, we believe that both prevalence (the unequal distribution of "Yes" vs. "No" validity decisions between the reviewers) and bias (from the reviewers' differing assessments of the frequency of study validity) may have yielded misleading results given our high percentage of crude agreement.