Exact(1)
A simplified method for accounting for the effects of fluid-structure interaction (FSI) in sandwich structures subjected to dynamic underwater loads is developed.
Similar(59)
But more significant "bunkering," as oil theft is known here, involves siphoning oil from pipes on land or underwater, loading it onto small barges, then transferring it to bigger barges offshore in the Gulf of Guinea.
A proper material model is required for the prediction of the failure and post-failure behavior of these sandwiches during (indirect) underwater explosion loading and blast loading.
The compressive response of sandwich plates with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) foam cores and aluminum facesheets to water-based impulsive loading is analyzed using an instrumented impulsive loading apparatus called the underwater shock loading simulator (USLS) and a fully-dynamic 3-D computational framework.
The plates are subjected to underwater impulsive loads of different intensities with a lab-scaled underwater explosive simulator.
Underwater blast loads using 1.28 kg TNT equivalent charge at a stand-off distance of 1 m were performed on four different composite sandwich panels.
This work addresses the transient responses of a panel structure reinforced by ribs of different sizes to underwater shock loads using non-linear finite element code-ABAQUS.
One of the major problems confronted by the designer of submersibles is to minimize the weight of the pressure hull for increasing the payload of a crew and necessary equipment and to simultaneously enhance the strength of the pressure hull for withstanding hydrostatical pressure, underwater explosive loading and other environmental loading.
Special attention was paid to the compression tension load reversal of the material model, that may occur during underwater shock loading.
The effect of underwater shock loading on an E-Glass/Epoxy composite material has been studied.
The response of E-Glass/Vinyl ester curved composite panels subjected to underwater explosive loading has been studied.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com