understood with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "understood with" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey a sense of comprehension in relation to something, but it is not a commonly used expression. Example: "The concept was not easily understood with the given explanation."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

But this car can't be understood with statistics.

The New York Times

This may be best understood with an example.

The New York Times - Travel

What I understood, I understood with awe, amazement and absolute belief.

The Guardian - Books

I understood with a sinking feeling that I was supposed to keep talking.

The New Yorker

Somehow I understood with utter clarity: I could lose the baby.

The New York Times - Magazine

DNA is being sequenced, synthesized and understood with increasing rate and decreasing cost.

The New York Times

The role of organisms as influences on the composition of seawater has become better understood with advances in marine biology.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Instead, they can be understood with quantitative tools and analysis.

European Transport Research Review

Quality of data can be understood with associated quality attributes.

Journal of Big Data

Can Mexico's deadly drug war be understood with science?

Science Magazine

Lymphatic disorders are poorly understood with few animal models.

Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Opt for clearer and more standard alternatives like "understood through", "understood via", or "understood in terms of" to improve grammatical correctness and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "with" to connect understanding to a method or perspective. Instead, use prepositions that clearly indicate the relationship, such as "through", "via", or "in light of."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "understood with" functions as a prepositional phrase that attempts to relate a subject's comprehension to an associated element. However, according to Ludwig AI, this construction is not considered grammatically standard.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

47%

News & Media

17%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "understood with" is frequently used across diverse sources, including scientific and news outlets. However, Ludwig AI flags it as grammatically non-standard, recommending alternatives like "understood through", "understood via", or "understood in terms of" for greater clarity and grammatical correctness. While its intent is generally to link comprehension to a method or context, its imprecise nature can lead to ambiguity. Therefore, while common, writers should carefully consider more precise phrasing to ensure clarity and maintain grammatical rigor, especially in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

understood in terms of

Focuses on interpreting something within a specific framework or context.

understood by means of

Highlights the method or tool used to achieve understanding.

understood through

Emphasizes the process or medium through which comprehension is gained.

understood in light of

Suggests that understanding is achieved by considering new information or perspective.

grasped with the aid of

Indicates that a particular tool or assistance facilitated understanding.

comprehended via

A more formal way to say something is understood through a specific means.

interpreted using

Highlights the application of a specific method to understand something.

discerned through

Implies a careful or insightful understanding achieved via specific observations.

elucidated by

Focuses on clarifying something with the use of a particular method or example.

made clear by

Simple alternative focusing on the clarifying aspect of how something is understood.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "understood with" to improve my writing?

Consider using alternatives such as "understood through", "understood via", or "understood in terms of" for better clarity and grammatical accuracy.

Is "understood with" grammatically correct?

While "understood with" appears in some contexts, it's often considered grammatically awkward. It is advisable to use more precise alternatives for clarity.

What's the difference between "understood with" and "understood through"?

"Understood with" is a less precise and sometimes grammatically questionable construction. "Understood through" clearly indicates the means or process by which understanding is achieved, making it a stronger choice.

In what contexts might I see "understood with" used?

You may encounter "understood with" across various types of sources, but it's more common in less formal or carefully edited content. Formal writing benefits from more precise and standard phrasing.