It plays a crucial role in obtaining and understanding results in the neurosciences.
Crucial to understanding results is the size and precision of the estimate.
Fourteen of these studies collectively reported that 'insufficient knowledge' or 'lack of understanding' resulted in poor care outcomes, unrealistic patient expectations and confusion over what to expect and how to manage changes in their condition, eliciting anxiety and frustration.
In terms of ease of understanding, results are readily understandable but the authors did not provide details about the parameters used nor whether these are for a single machine over time, averages across several, or best or worst values.
Like Locke, the Italian philosopher Giambattista Vico believed that human beings are not innately rational; he argued, however, that understanding results not through sense perception but through imaginative reconstruction.
The development of such understanding results through communication and use of specified vocabulary [4].
In Zabarella's opinion this order of understanding results from our own inability to comprehend everything at once.
However, the pathogenesis is far from good understanding, resulting in difficulties in designing effective treatments.
It was noticed that the questions were of easy understanding, resulting in minimal changes and the removal of a repetitive item.
This type of argument is called the "deficit model", a largely discredited theory that "attributes public scepticism or hostility to a lack of understanding, resulting from a lack of information".
