The phrase "understandable content" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to information or material that is clear and easy to comprehend.
Example: "The tutorial provided understandable content that helped beginners grasp the concepts quickly."
Alternatives: "clear content" or "comprehensible material".
"Understandable content" here means propositions expressed by language which the hearer "grasps" or understands the meaning of, and which seem to her to be consistent.
More common is a moderate form, where mysterianism supplements a Trinity theory which has some understandable content, but which is vague or otherwise problematic.
Mysterianism is a meta-theory of the Trinity, that is, a theory about trinitarian theories, to the effect that an acceptable Trinity theory must, given our present epistemic limitations, to some degree lack understandable content.
As the NIF is built from independently maintained and developed resources, NIF also has had to grapple with how to make content understandable, and to keep content up-to-date and accurate.
We successfully developed an initial draft of SSPedi that is easy to complete, understandable and has content validity according to children with cancer.
Using opinions of children with cancer and parents of paediatric cancer patients, we successfully developed a symptom screening tool that is easy to complete, is understandable and demonstrates content validity.
In so doing, an item in a scale was assigned when its assignation was understandable from its content and it loaded on one factor (> = 0.50 on one factor, <0.40 on all the others).
The learning system which has been designed involves some electronic applications and tests to make the content more understandable and to improve student's knowledge.
We got submissions from all over the world -- including from Japan and Russia -- so the nature of the content is understandable regardless of the language and the cultural differences.
The ANSWER prototype was reviewed by the research team, patients/consumers (OK, CK, CM) and a health education consultant (GE) to ensure that the content was understandable to people without a research or clinical background.
The structured guideline for the FG was to answer questions concerning: a) whether an item was understandable, b) whether the content of an item was important concerning care of chronically ill patients and c) whether there were any important aspects missing regarding care of the chronically ill in Germany.
