Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(58)
According to the premotor theory of attention (Rizzolatti et al., 1994), the mechanisms responsible for the control of selective attention and the mechanisms underlying response selection and activation are implemented by common mechanisms.
The neural mechanisms underlying response inhibition and related disorders are unclear and controversial for several reasons.
Based on the information collected from the 280 experts, a factor analysis method was used to explore the underlying response patterns.
The probability that an individual will choose to own camels depends on an underlying response variable that the expected utility from owning camels is greater than the utility of not.
The neural circuitry underlying response control is often studied using go/no-go tasks, in which participants are required to respond as fast as possible to go cues and withhold from responding to no-go stimuli.
The neuronal processes underlying response inhibition are often studied using either event-related potentials (ERPs) or by applying transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate excitatory and inhibitory processes in the motor system.
In contrast, when rewards are non related to performance, as in the present study, then stimuli become associated with the rewards that have been coupled with them, regardless of the attentional operations underlying response selection – within Pavlovian associative learning (e.g., [43]), a phenomenon similar to evaluative conditioning (e.g., [44], [45]).
Trying to determine the principles or even mechanisms underlying response enhancement to repeated presentation of identical FM stimuli (i.e with the same modulation direction) is difficult as even the representation of single FM tones has only been studied in very few investigations using electrophysiological or MEG techniques [30], [31].
This work was the first to enlighten the molecular mechanisms underlying response of plants to competition.
Similar(2)
Although to our knowledge there is no direct evidence that the IPS expresses adaptively scaled magnitude signals, it has been suggested that its function in magnitude estimation is strongly linked with underlying response-selection [Gobel et al., 2004; Walsh, 2003].
Recent investigations into the mechanism underlying response-inhibition training also support stimulus-specific effects: Affective cues associated with no-go responses show a reduction in rated valence (Doallo et al., 2012; Veling et al., 2013a; Veling, Holland, & Van Knippenberg, 2008) and more negative implicit affective reactions (Houben, Nederkoorn, & Jansen, 2012b; Veling & Aarts, 2009).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com