under whose insouciance

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "under whose insouciance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a situation or context where someone is oblivious or indifferent to the consequences of their actions or the circumstances around them. Example: "The project failed miserably, under whose insouciance the team had proceeded without proper planning."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Behind the bio-play structure, however, Brenton presents Macmillan as a tragic figure under whose insouciance lay an anguished soul.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Robbins's refined blue group — led by Abi Stafford and Gonzalo Garcia — grapples with Ms. Tharp's green counterpart, Wendy Whelan and Andrew Veyette, whose insouciance and crisp attack were a constant delight.

The New York Times - Arts

He may be dying, but he's still an annoying little twit whose insouciance is much more repulsive than all his cancerous lesions.

The New York Times

Behind the bio-play structure, however, Brenton presents Macmillan as an ultimately tragic figure under whose public insouciance lay an anguished soul.

The Guardian

Under whose mattress?

The Guardian

By whose armies, under whose command?

The Guardian - Opinion

Under whose flag would China unite?

The New York Times - Books

Mr. Vasiliev, whose leaps and insouciance sent ripples of gasps through the audience at the Coliseum here, was being treated carefully to ensure that he does not burn out.

The New York Times - Arts

Watch Jimmy Kimmel, whose sleepy-eyed insouciance hides a killer B.S. detector.

Huffington Post

"I wanted authenticity, irreverence and insouciance," said Mr. Dundas, whose vacation home in the Cyclades, so far from his native Norway, inspired the Pucci show.

The New York Times

The party, whose leaders are under criminal investigation, came third.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "under whose insouciance", ensure the context clearly establishes a causal relationship between the lack of concern and the resulting situation. This phrase is most effective when highlighting the negative consequences of indifference.

Common error

Avoid using "under whose insouciance" when the outcome is not directly attributable to a lack of concern. Ensure that the insouciance is the primary driver, not a mere contributing factor.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "under whose insouciance" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or verb, indicating the condition or state under which something occurs. It suggests that a lack of concern or indifference is the governing factor.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "under whose insouciance" is a prepositional phrase used to indicate that a situation or outcome is a direct result of someone's lack of concern or indifference. According to Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct. While relatively rare, it's most frequently found in news and media contexts, often serving a critical or analytical purpose. When using this phrase, it's important to ensure that the lack of concern is indeed the primary cause. Alternatives such as "under whose negligence" or "under whose indifference" can offer subtly different shades of meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

under whose lack of concern

Directly states the absence of worry or interest as the primary driver of events.

under whose unconcern

Similar to "lack of concern" but with a slightly more formal tone.

under whose indifference

Substitutes "insouciance" with "indifference", focusing on a lack of interest or concern as the influencing factor.

under whose negligence

Replaces "insouciance" with a stronger term implying a failure to exercise proper care, highlighting direct responsibility for negative outcomes.

under whose disregard

Highlights a conscious decision to ignore or dismiss something important, leading to specific consequences.

under whose casualness

Focuses on the informal and relaxed attitude that leads to specific actions or outcomes.

under whose apathy

Emphasizes a lack of feeling or emotion as the reason for inaction or poor decision-making.

due to whose nonchalance

Changes the preposition from "under" to "due to" to indicate causality, emphasizing the impact of a relaxed and unconcerned attitude.

under whose recklessness

Conveys a sense of dangerous or careless behavior that stems from a lack of forethought.

under whose lightheartedness

Suggests a superficial or frivolous approach that influences events.

FAQs

How can I use "under whose insouciance" in a sentence?

You can use "under whose insouciance" to describe a situation where someone's lack of concern or indifference leads to a specific outcome. For example, "The project failed, under whose insouciance the team proceeded without proper planning."

What phrases are similar to "under whose insouciance"?

Similar phrases include "under whose negligence", "under whose indifference", or "due to whose nonchalance", each conveying a slightly different nuance of the cause.

Is "under whose insouciance" a formal or informal expression?

"Under whose insouciance" leans toward a more formal register, suitable for analytical or critical writing rather than casual conversation.

What's the difference between "under whose insouciance" and "under whose leadership"?

"Under whose insouciance" implies a lack of care or concern contributing to an outcome, whereas "under whose leadership" refers to the influence or direction provided by a leader, without necessarily implying negligence or apathy.