Dummett argues that the meanings of statements must be explicated not in terms of potentially evidence-transcendent truth-conditions but by reference to conditions such as those under which a statement counts as proved or justified which can be recognized to obtain whenever they do.
Thus, according to Dummett, the meanings of sentences must be explicated not in terms of potentially evidence-transcendent truth-conditions but by reference to conditions such as those under which a statement counts as correctly asserted that can be recognized to obtain whenever they do.
For scientific futures research the crucial question is under which conditions a statement concerning the future represents knowledge.
A nanopublication consists of three parts: a statement, e.g., protein X (subject) catalyzes (predicate) reaction Y (object), conditions under which the statement holds, e.g., a specific compartment, and provenance of the statement, e.g., author and literature.
Several officials said that Captain Smith's conversations with the police and prosecutors yesterday were conducted under a proffer agreement, known as "queen for a day," under which his statements could not be used against him in any subsequent trial.
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote separately in agreement with the result, proposing a test under which fewer statements would be likely to be excluded than under the majority's approach.
The latter consisted of a set of logical axioms (statements considered to be truths of logic) and a set of rules of inference that lay out the conditions under which certain statements of the language may be correctly inferred from others.
He described the conditions under which the statements had been made, denied or explained them, and insisted that the confession was a suggested one.
With this, those statements can be regarded bearing in mind the circumstances under which the statements were made, especially their inflammatory nature as statements that incite others to discriminate against persons who originate from Morocco". (§ 5.4.3.2) This being the case, Wilders was found guilty of incitement to discrimination.
"Based on my knowledge," states the Sifma-proposed certification, "the prospectus does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading".
"The report and its contents, along with the totality of the investigation and the timing under which the statements were given, were provided to the judge at the time the search and arrest warrants were issued," Tom Sneddon, the Santa Barbara County district attorney, and Sheriff Jim Anderson said in a joint statement.
