The phrase 'under globalisation' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to refer to economic and social changes that are occurring worldwide as a result of increased globalization. For example, you could use the phrase 'under globalisation' in a sentence such as "The world has become increasingly interconnected under globalisation."
Under globalisation, different nations can achieve rapid and sustainable growth by focusing their innovation activities on various stages of production.
While those in the former, including the outer city banlieues, have flourished under globalisation, those "new working classes in la France périphérique" including "native French...and those from old immigration waves" are pushed out and "forgotten", he argues.
They go to the essential questions of the role of the nation state in the neoliberal age: the capacity for democratic engagement under globalisation, and the ability of a continent once riven by war and genocide to keep the peace.
You would expect the Wall Street Journal to dissent, but the power of Piketty's work is that it also challenges the narrative of the centre-left under globalisation, which believed upskilling the workforce, combined with mild redistribution, would promote social justice.
The unifying theme is less clear here than that in the other sections, especially given the inclusion of Rass's chapter on Africa, although in themselves, all contributing chapters offer detailed and fascinating insights into evolving market relations under globalisation.
Drawing on the work of Michael Mann, we focus on a neglected dimension of state power––namely, its ideological form as a means of exploring how the nation state is being differentially re-engineered under globalisation.
A third factor is the under-regulated globalisation of gambling, and its exploitation by match-fixers and money-launderers.
Citing the work of the late Benedict Anderson, especially the 1983 book "Imagined Communities," Mazower wrote, "Under the globalisation juggernaut, we all feel small now, even the US, and this is perhaps the main difference between Reagan-era Republican tub-thumping and Trump's".
Conscious of the under-analysis of globalisation in Southern agriculture in general, this article has three broad aims.
Somewhere in their arguments, there also lurks an under-appreciated effect of globalisation: that with power blocs long superseded by the dominance of the free market, the idea that shifting our foreign policy would bring economic ruin looks very old-fashioned.
The secret of its success, he says, has been to tap into the anger of the "losers from globalisation" under its leader since 2005, Heinz-Christian Strache.
