uncovered for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "uncovered for" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express the idea of revealing something for a specific purpose or audience, but it lacks clarity and proper usage. Example: "The evidence was uncovered for the investigation, shedding light on the case."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Simmer uncovered for an hour or two.

Independent

Simmer, uncovered, for 10 to 15 minutes.

The New York Times

Simmer uncovered for 40 minutes.

The New York Times - Magazine

2. Roast brisket, uncovered, for 20 minutes.

The New York Times

Simmer uncovered for 20 minutes, stirring frequently.

The New York Times

Cook uncovered for 1/4 hour.

The New Yorker

Simmer uncovered for 1 hour or as desired.

The New York Times - Food

5. Refrigerate, uncovered, for 8 to 24 hours.

The New York Times - Magazine

Reduce the heat and simmer, uncovered, for 2 hours.

The New York Times - Magazine

Cook, uncovered, for 3½ to 5 hours, stirring occasionally.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Leave the dish uncovered for a crunchy top.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, replace "uncovered for" with more precise alternatives like "revealed for", "exposed for", or rephrase the sentence to use a more direct verb.

Common error

Avoid using "uncovered for" when a clearer preposition or verb can express the intended relationship. For example, instead of "uncovered for evaporation", try "uncovered to allow evaporation" or "uncovered to facilitate evaporation".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "uncovered for" typically functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying a verb or noun to indicate the reason or duration for which something is exposed or revealed. However, according to Ludwig AI, this construction is not grammatically correct, which suggests the need for clearer phrasing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Wiki

37%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "uncovered for" is frequently used across various contexts, including news, media, and scientific literature. However, according to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically questionable and lacks clarity. While common, especially in cooking instructions and procedural explanations, it's advisable to opt for more precise alternatives like "revealed for" or rephrasing for improved grammatical accuracy and clarity. Be aware of the intended nuance (purpose, duration) when selecting a substitute.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

revealed for

Emphasizes the act of making something known or visible for a specific purpose.

exposed for

Highlights the act of uncovering or making something accessible, often implying vulnerability or scrutiny.

left exposed for

Indicates a state of being open or vulnerable for a specified duration or purpose.

revealed in order to

Clearly expresses that the act of unveiling is done with a specific intention or aim.

made public for

Focuses on disseminating information to a wider audience for a particular reason.

unveiled for

Similar to 'revealed for', but carries a more formal and ceremonial connotation.

shown for

Emphasizes the act of demonstrating or displaying something for a particular reason.

brought to light for

Highlights the act of revealing something previously hidden or unknown for a specific purpose.

disclosed for

Indicates the release of confidential or private information for a particular reason.

opened up for

Suggests making something accessible or available for a specific purpose or audience.

FAQs

What does "uncovered for" mean?

The phrase "uncovered for" is grammatically questionable and lacks precise meaning. It is often used to indicate that something was revealed or left open for a certain purpose. You might consider using "revealed for" or "exposed for" as more suitable alternatives.

Is "uncovered for" grammatically correct?

No, "uncovered for" is not considered grammatically correct. It's better to use phrases like "revealed for" or rephrase the sentence for clarity.

What can I say instead of "uncovered for"?

You can use alternatives such as "revealed for", "exposed for", or "left uncovered to" depending on the specific context.

How can I improve the clarity when using the idea of "uncovered for" in a sentence?

Focus on using more precise verbs and prepositions that clearly express the relationship you intend to convey. For example, instead of "uncovered for observation", use "uncovered to facilitate observation".