Exact(1)
Descriptions of each item: Yes (score 2); Unclear (score 1); No (score 0).
Similar(59)
Unclear: scored when information is insufficient to permit a decision.
After the consensus meeting, we decided to score all unclear scores as negative.
They may have unclear scoring criteria and wide variations in structure, content and focus.
Unclear: scored when no or insufficient information is provided on the different reference standards used.
Unclear: scored when no or insufficient information is provided to permit a judgement.
Studies scoring 4 or 5, or with unclear scores (for example if the cancer sites included were not specified in the abstract) were retrieved for scrutiny (n = 80).
Unclear: scored when no or insufficient information is provided to ascertain whether the whole sample or a random selection of the sample received verification with a reference standard.
No: for example, if only ill children are sampled for the reference standard, or if stool samples with blood are thrown away to avoid contaminating technicians Unclear: scored when information on the reference standard used or sample preparation technique used was insufficient.
Studies that answered "no" or "unclear" were scored 0 for each scoring system with the exception of system 2 in which studies that scored "unclear" were given 1.
* Information unclear A score of 1 was given for each parameter fulfilled in the text with an additional point for adequate description of randomisation, allocation concealment and blinding.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com