Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
Links provided there lead me to think that the overall Church of Christ position does not embrace evolution as compatible with their beliefs; this might be incorrect, and so I have placed them in the "unclear" category in Table 1.
The "unclear" category was used when insufficient data were reported to permit judgment.
If the item was not clearly reported, it was considered as a "no" response and the unclear category would simply be duplication.
All the included studies were reported as being randomised, however for the majority of studies (n = 41) the method of randomisation was unclear (Category 2) and concealment of allocation was rare.
Columns: observed categories, rows: true categories, last row: accuracies, bold: efficiencies, Mg: purebred Microcebus griseorufus, Mm: purebred M. murinus, F1: Mg × Mm, F2: F1 × F1, Mg-Bx1: F1 × Mg, Mm-Bx1: F1 × Mm, Mg-Bx2: Mg-Bx1 × Mg, Mm-Bx2: Mm-Bx1 × Mm, H.u.c.: hybrid of unclear category.
Similar(55)
But this could also be the result of an unclear question category or bad wording in the study design.
First, it leaves it unclear what category of thing a "moral judgment" is; in particular, is it a mental state or a linguistic entity?
With respect to IHNV, it is unclear what category the asymptomatic carriers observed in our study would fall into.
Clinical guidelines suggest testing for respiratory viruses during the influenza season, but are unclear which categories of patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) should be tested.
The category unclear indicated unclear or unknown risk of bias [ 40].
One difficulty, raised by Malcolm Budd (Budd 2002 and 2003) and Robert Stecker (Stecker1997c), is that since there are many categories in which a given natural item may correctly be perceived, it is unclear which correct category is the one in which the item is perceived as having the aesthetic properties it actually has.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com