Areawide contracts in bus and rail appear to fit this circumstance, in contrast to somewhat simple and relatively unambiguous bus route contracts.
Implicit in the arguments is the need to develop trusting partnerships and (incomplete) commercial contracts with unambiguous incentive and penalty structures throughout the life of a contract, with market mechanisms such as competitive tendering always present as a way forward when operators fail to comply under reasonable notice.
Eagle Indus., 702 at2d at 1232 ("If a contract is unambiguous, extrinsic evidence may not be used to interpret the intent of the parties, to vary the terms of the contract or to create an ambiguity". (citing Pellaton, 592 at2d at 478; Citadel, 603 A.2d 818)).
See Eagle Indus., Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc., 702 A.2d 1228, 1232 (Del.1997) ("If a contract is unambiguous, extrinsic evidence may not be used to interpret the intent of the parties, to vary the terms of the contract or to create an ambiguity". (citing Pellaton v. Bank of New York, 592 A.2d 478, 478 (Del. 1991); Citadel Holding Corp. v. Roven, 603 A.2Del18 (Del.1992))).1992
I am part of a cohort of trainees for whom the contract is an unambiguous benefit.
Where the statutory text adopted by both Houses of Congress contains a phrase that is unambiguous, the court may not expand or contract its meaning by relying on the statements of individual committees during the course of the enactment process.
One commonly cited argument in favor of blockchain-based smart contracts is that they are unambiguous.
Because a federal court should exercise extreme caution before assuming jurisdiction not clearly conferred by Congress, we should not condone the implication of federal jurisdiction over contract claims in the absence of an unambiguous expression of congressional intent.
However, for all types of contract cycles of gold futures, we found unambiguous volatility clustering, and the ARCH-LM test results also suggested the presence of an ARCH effect.
While we understand the distinction intended by Cal-State, we are not persuaded that appellate review of a contract interpretation issue can be properly analogized to review of an unambiguous forum selection clause.
The contracts say what they say, and this Court may interpret unambiguous contractual terms as a matter of law.
