unacceptable amount of errors

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "unacceptable amount of errors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a level of errors that is deemed intolerable or not permissible in a particular context, such as work, academic writing, or quality control. Example: "The report was returned due to an unacceptable amount of errors, which need to be corrected before resubmission."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

It is quite possible that in an attempt to avoid type I error we are introducing an unacceptable amount of type II errors.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

"It has to cause an unacceptable amount of personal hardship," he said.

The New York Times

For population sizes below that critical value, commitment to a given cellular state would not take place due to the presence of an unacceptable amount of noise.

Plosone

None of the respondents felt that they had waited an unacceptable amount of time but almost all expressed a desire to be treated quickly.

BMC Cancer

It has been argued that the use of plastic bags is associated with an unacceptable amount of contamination (Trampuz et al. 2006).

Acta Orthopaedica

Whatever the cause, non-gaming mice potentially introduce an unacceptable amount of delay into the measurements and thus should be avoided.

Behavior Research Methods

This may result in painful urgent and emergent procedures in children being performed with inadequate pain control or being delayed for unacceptable amounts of time [12].

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

One batch was recalled because it was mouldy, another for unacceptable amounts of bacteria.  .

Vice

A certain amount of errors in both print and e-books is inevitable.

Huffington Post

set_error_verbosity Controls the amount of error information returned by ChIPS.

Harvard University

Controls the amount of error information returned by ChIPS.

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "unacceptable amount of errors", clearly define what constitutes an "error" in your specific context to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify whether you are referring to factual inaccuracies, grammatical mistakes, or calculation errors.

Common error

Avoid using "unacceptable amount of errors" without specifying what types of errors are being referenced. Being overly general can weaken your argument and make it difficult for your audience to understand the specific issue. For example, instead of saying "the report contained an unacceptable amount of errors", specify "the report contained an unacceptable amount of calculation errors and factual inaccuracies".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "unacceptable amount of errors" functions as a descriptor, characterizing the quantity of errors as being beyond what is tolerable or permissible. The phrase aims to pinpoint instances where mistakes undermine the reliability or quality of a work.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "unacceptable amount of errors" describes a situation where mistakes are too numerous or severe to be tolerated. While grammatically correct, the phrase lacks specific examples in Ludwig, indicating that its usage might benefit from increased context. Ludwig AI confirms that it is usable in written English. Related phrases include "excessive error rate" and "intolerable error margin", each offering slightly different nuances. When using this phrase, it's crucial to define what constitutes an "error" clearly and to specify the types of errors being referenced. This level of detail improves clarity and strengthens your argument. While the phrase is suitable for professional and academic contexts, its frequency is currently listed as 'Missing', suggesting that alternative phrasing might sometimes be preferable.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

excessive error rate

Replaces "amount" with "rate" and "unacceptable" with "excessive" focusing on the proportion of errors.

intolerable error margin

Substitutes "unacceptable amount" with "intolerable margin", implying a limit that cannot be exceeded.

unreasonable error level

Replaces "amount" with "level" and "unacceptable" with "unreasonable", suggesting a deviation from what is considered standard or acceptable.

prohibitive number of errors

Uses "prohibitive number" to emphasize that the quantity of errors prevents something from being viable.

excessive quantity of mistakes

Replaces "errors" with "mistakes" and "amount" with "quantity", simply changing the words for a similar meaning.

inadmissible degree of error

Replaces "unacceptable amount" with "inadmissible degree", indicating that the errors are not allowable or permissible.

unjustifiable error frequency

Emphasizes that the rate at which errors occur cannot be defended or excused.

unwarranted level of inaccuracy

Replaces "errors" with "inaccuracy" and frames the level of errors as not justified or deserved.

unsupportable error volume

Replaces "amount" with "volume", indicating the quantity of errors is too great to be tolerated or supported.

an egregious number of errors

The word "egregious" emphasizes the errors as remarkably bad or shocking.

FAQs

What does "unacceptable amount of errors" mean?

The phrase "unacceptable amount of errors" refers to a situation where the number or severity of mistakes is considered too high, making the work or result flawed or unreliable.

How can I determine if there is an "unacceptable amount of errors"?

Determining whether the amount of errors is unacceptable depends on the context and the expected standards. Factors to consider include the purpose of the document or task, the audience, and the potential consequences of the errors. What might be an acceptable error rate in a draft could be "intolerable" in a final, published document.

What are some alternatives to saying "unacceptable amount of errors"?

You can use alternatives such as "excessive error rate", "intolerable error margin", or "unreasonable error level" depending on the specific context and emphasis you want to convey.

Is it better to quantify the "unacceptable amount of errors" with a specific number or percentage?

Whenever possible, it is best to quantify the "unacceptable amount of errors" with a specific number or percentage. This provides a clearer understanding of the problem and sets a concrete goal for improvement. For example, instead of saying "an unacceptable amount of errors", you could say "a 10% error rate".