Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(19)
Results: Mann-Whitney U testing indicated that the patient (P) group was no less accurate in head repositioning than the control (C) group for all movement directions except flexion (median global positioning error [95% confidence interval], P = 5.7° [5.03-9.10], C = 4.2° [3.17-5.32]; p <.05).
Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis and statistical analysis performed with Mann-Whitney U testing.
Mann-Whitney U testing was used for analyzing comparisons between groups.
Although there are 120 ISS APRs higher than the corresponding CSS APRs, including 85 pairs of ∆APRs that are statistically significant by U testing, the mean value of all ∆APRs (overlapped red line) and baseline of Fig. 5a suggests that ISS and CSS generally have comparable precision performance.
Continuous variables were compared by independent Student t-testing if normally distributed or otherwise by means of Mann Whitney U testing.
In order to adjust for false discovery rate caused by repeated Mann-Whitney U testing, we used a type I error bootstrap correction with 1000 iterations per generation following an established procedure for large scale datasets coded by Matlab R2007b [36], [52], [54], [55].
Similar(41)
If u test positive u need to not play.
** denotes p < 0.001 by Mann-Whitney U test.
p-values calculated by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test.
Statistics analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Statistical significance was assessed by Mann Whitney U test (two-sided).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com