Sentence examples for u rotation from inspiring English sources

Dt net revenue from thinning at age t. c planting costs at age t = 0. u rotation period.

The frequency-domain input symbols X with N tones are phase rotated by U phase rotations vectors of size N as given below begin{array}{*{20}l} mathbf{X}^{(u)}=mathbf{X}~odot~{boldsymbol{phi}}^{(u },~0leq uleq U-1, end{array} (5).

In the conventional SLM technique, to reduce the value of PAPR, the input sequence is multiplied by U phase rotation vectors [11].

With M FBMC-OQAM symbols and U phase rotation vectors, we need to find the best path in the trellis of Fig. 2 that gives the lowest PAPR.

Step 1 Initialization: Firstly, we generate M complex input symbol vectors {X 0,X 1,…,X M−1} and U phase rotation vectors {ϕ (0),ϕ (1),…,ϕ (U−1)} of length N as per (3).

The two optimal states between the two successive stages are chosen among others, based on the least PAPR criterion that has been computed over a given time instant T 0. The TSLM algorithm involves the following steps: Step 1 Initialization: Firstly, we generate M complex input symbol vectors {X 0,X 1,…,X M−1} and U phase rotation vectors {ϕ (0),ϕ (1),…,ϕ (U−1)} of length N as per (3).

In order to achieve the optimal performance in PAPR reduction, one need to consider all the possible U phase rotations for all M symbols and pick out the best one out of the U M different combinations.

Note that the best dominant is unique up to a rotation of U × U ¯. Let φ : C 3 × U × U ¯ → C, and let h ( z, ξ ) be analytic in U × U ¯.

Furthermore, the type of LBP operator on each plane can vary; for example, the uniform pattern (u 2) or rotation invariant uniform pattern (riu 2) variants [20] can be deployed.

SLM was introduced in [7], where we generate U complex phase rotation vectors ϕ (u), for 0≤u≤U−1, of length N as: begin{array}{*{20}l} {boldsymbol{phi}}^{(u)}=left{ begin{array}{ll} left(1,ldots,1right)^{mathsf{T}},&u=0, left({phi}_{0}^{(u },ldots,{phi}_{N-1}^{(u }right)^{mathsf{T}},&1leq uleq U-1, end{array}right.

The factors that influence the exfoliation in the CUM process, including the initial concentration of natural molybdenite powders (C in, 15 55 g L−1), ultrasonic power (P u, 200 350 W), rotation speed of sand mill (ω s, 1500 2250 r.p.m), exfoliation time (t ex, 0.5 6 h), and the molar ratio of PVP unit to MoS2 (R pm, 0 1), were systematically investigated.