The results of the technological, stylistic and typological comparisons confirm our hypothesis that the Magdalenian portable art from sites in Moravia belong to the Magdalenian techno-complex.
This is based largely on typological comparisons of excavated vessels, but lack of physical evidence makes this a difficult task.
The comparison of typological objects in Moravia, like decorated bone disc, pendants, Venus, bâton percé, spatule, shows that their variability is well in the range expected for techno-complex.
This article shows, through a typological survey and a detailed comparison of Passamaquoddy and Mandarin Chinese, that there is no connection between wh-in-situ and either property.
Moreover, a multi-span arch bridge is analyzed, performing a comparison among different typological possibilities, and using examples of real structures in the Carrión river basin (Spain).
Related to typological guidance is the technique of transfer comparison (cf. Caffarel et al. 2004. Ch. 1).
In order to maximise reliable comparisons and generalisations, Christian Matthiessen and Kazuhiro Teruya (e.g. Matthiessen 2015c) has developed a typology of registers based on the contextual parameter of field of activity to support typological work (following Jean Ure's text typology).
A comparison of mineralogical composition, smelting and forging techniques, and earlier typological analysis indicates that the gold used to make the inscribed ring, classified as Celto-Germanic, is neither as pure as that of the Graeco-Roman, nor as alloyed as that found in the Polychrome Germanic objects.
Greenberg rejected any classification based merely on general typological features e.g., that several languages possess noun classes unless this was substantiated by a detailed comparison of the actual forms by which these systems were realized.
With the Bootstrapping Sound Changes technique, we can compare Historical Probabilities of attested and unattested alternations and perform inferential statistics on the comparison, predict (un attestedness in a given sample for any alternation, and derive quantitative outputs for a typological framework that models both Channel Bias and Analytical Bias influences together.
With the BSC technique we can compare Historical Probabilities of attested and unattested alternations and perform inferential statistics on the comparison, predict (un attestedness in a given sample for any alternation, and derive quantitative outputs for a typological framework that models both Channel Bias and Analytical Bias influences together.
