Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The next best option after the sterilization methods is the progestin shot given every three months and has a typical use failure rate of 6%%.
This type of behavior is the primary cause of typical use failure (as opposed to method or perfect use failure).
Similar(57)
Considering the typical-use failure rates of these methods [2], [14], and dividing those arbitrarily by 5 to compensate for aging, the 52 women could expect to have between them eight to ten unintended pregnancies [14], [2].
Typical-use failure rates (the percentage of women experiencing an unintended pregnancy during the first year of typical use) for short-acting methods range from 6% (Depo-Provera injectables) to 28% (spermicides), while failure rates for traditional methods can be as high as 22% (withdrawal).
The perfect use first-year failure rate of the injectable progestin, Depo-Provera, is 0.2%; the typical use first failure rate is 6%.
If taken exactly according to the provided instructions (perfect use), oral contraceptives are almost 100% reliable, with a failure rate of 0.1 per 100 women in the first year of use [ 2]; in clinical practice (typical use), the failure rate can be up to 5 per 100 women years [ 2], mainly due to non-compliance or imperfect compliance with the once daily regimen [ 3- 5].
With typical use first-year failure rates are considerably high, at 9%, due to incorrect usage.
Male condoms and the diaphragm with spermicide have typical use first-year failure rates of 18% and 12%, respectively.
The agency found the number of reported unwanted pregnancies reported by users to be in line with Natural Cycles' certification documents for the product, finding a failure rate in typical use of 6.9%.
However, Natural Cycles put a scientific spin on the age-old method by evaluating more than 15,000 women to determine its algorithm had an effectiveness rate with a margin of error of 1.8percentt for "perfect use" and a 6percentt failure rate for "typical use".
The failure rate during typical use is 12 per 100 woman-years.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com