Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
We use the correlation time τ c =1,730 years and a typical standard deviation of σ=40,000 nT.
The typical standard deviation is ±0.6 on the tissue damage scale.
With brain volumes generally in the 1200-1400cc rande, and standard deviations in the range of 100cc, a difference of 34cc represents about 3% of total TBV, or about one third of one typical standard deviation.
This is likely due to difficulties in accurately discriminating small differences between the sample and control (100% methylated DNA for MethyLight and MSRE qPCR and 0% methylated DNA for MDRE qPCR) by PCR, i.e. for RE qPCR analysis, a 10% difference translates to a difference in Cq of only 0.2, which is comparable to the typical standard deviation of Cq technical replicates.
However, the sampling error of the estimates of genetic variance was high because the variation in actual relationship was small (typical standard deviation (SD) of 3.9% of the mean of 50% for human full-sibs, as expected from theory [ 5, 7- 10]).
If we use the maximum coefficient of variation (10% for the time span between first flowering of Coltsfoot (Tussilago farfara) and first fruits of Common oaks) observed in these data sets we would expect a typical standard deviation in the length of the foraging season of about 5 days.
Similar(54)
Compared to the contact system, the designed non-contact system also has an improved repeatability: the typical standard deviations reach about 50 μm/m and 10 μm/m before and after setting, respectively.
We find that the typical experimental precision is higher than commonly assumed with typical standard deviations between 0.21 and 0.26 log units.
This method has typical standard deviations between 10 and 30%.
Typical standard deviations were 0.15 ppbv for ethylene measurements under steady state conditions.
Typical standard deviations for the change between baseline and follow-up in knee OA trials are around 22 mm.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com