Ai Feedback
Exact(17)
The typical retention behaviors of impurities at various pH values were depicted graphically.
The typical retention times of Imp-A, Imp-B, Imp-C, Imp-D, and lafutidine were about 1.37, 1.75, 3.64, 4.79, and 5.04 min, respectively (Figures 2 and 3), and the developed UPLC method was found to be specific for determination of lafutidine and its impurities in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form.
Typical retention times were 1.61 min for isoflurane and 1.93 min for halothane.
The absorbance was determined at 450 nm using a Perkin-Elmer (Waltham, MA, USA) LC290 UV-Vis detector Lycopene were identified by its characteristic absorption spectra and its typical retention time compared to standard commercial compound (Sigma-Aldrich).
The typical retention time for the butyrate was 30 min.
Typical retention times: acetoin: 5.3 min (R) and 5.6 min (S).
Similar(43)
Figure 12b shows typical data retention characteristics as well as 10 y extrapolated data retention under a CC of 200 μA, performed at 25 °C.
(a) Typical data retention characteristics of our Al/Cu/Al2O3/TiN CBRAM device.
(d) Typical data retention characteristics at a small CC of 1 nA for a device size of 8 × 8 μm2.
The effects of water content, buffer pH and concentration were investigated and a typical HILIC retention feature of Click TE-RA was observed at high organic modifier content.
Synthetic gastric juice containing H+ and Cl− did exhibit reduced bromate ion levels, but at a rate that was too slow for a significant amount of bromate to be reduced under typical stomach retention time conditions.
Related(20)
classic retention
normal retention
particular retention
distinctive retention
general retention
regular retention
traditional retention
significant retention
distinct retention
specific retention
common retention
perfect retention
usual retention
routine retention
standard retention
typical toff
typical answer
typical teenager
typical storyline
typical malice
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com