The phrase "typical methodologies" is correct and usable in written English.
The phrase is usually used in a professional context to refer to established scientific or business practices. For example, "I studied the typical methodologies used in the market research field."
Typical methodologies and general guidance on how to contribute the expertise of ergonomist to sustainable development are also discussed.
Indeed, main computational tasks are today focused on the optimization and adaptation of typical methodologies in bioinformatics to the magnitude of NGS collections.
The typical methodologies assessed the performance of the problem under the variability of the uncertain parameters by optimizing the expected value of the objective function.
Based on this, only typical methodologies for avoiding over-fitting occurrences and maintaining high generalization ability were considered in this work (e.g. selecting appropriate training algorithms for the employed ML models, as outlined in the sequel; setting not too strict termination criteria during training; etc).
While interactions among explanatory variables are considered for feature selection, in accordance with typical methodologies in this area [ 10, 33], such interactions are not currently evaluated for the purposes of identifying the significance of risk factors.
A typical methodology is to aggregate a large number of peer user's ratings, often seen in e-commerce product/service ratings.
For the qualitative detection of the cellulolytic potential of the bacterial isolates, a typical methodology, described by Hankin and Anagnostakis (1975) was applied.
A typical methodology for policy refinement is the process of incremental decomposition, wherein at each refinement step (level), the generated policies are checked against the requirements of the policies from previous step for correctness and consistency.
However, whatever the plausibility of this account with respect to actual token actions or persons, it is less clear how the counterfactual criterion would apply to the moral status of actions featured in the merely hypothetical cases found in typical methodology.
In each of these models, surgically created focal defects in the knee (stifle) have been the typical methodology employed.
The typical methodology for examining criterion validity is concurrent validity which correlates the new scale against another instrument, ideally, a 'gold standard' [ 4].
