Sentence examples for types of responsiveness from inspiring English sources

In this paper I examine two types of responsiveness, one which concerns the changing environment and another the activities and needs of the building׳s inhabitants.

Some basic types of responsiveness such as reflexes can be mediated by the spinal cord or peripheral ganglia, but sophisticated purposeful control of behavior based on complex sensory input requires the information integrating capabilities of a centralized brain.

Husted and colleagues reviewed the literature and defined two major types of responsiveness: internal and external responsiveness [ 34].

Future studies will hopefully clarify the in vivo pathogenic potential of this type of responsiveness.

Apart from the type of responsiveness index, other factors affect the size of the responsiveness index such as type of intervention, patient population under study, and timing of data collection [ 17, 21, 22].

In the present study, we assessed the outcome of all ER and PgR combinations to establish definitions of the three types of endocrine responsiveness.

As to endocrine responsiveness, the outcome of unclassified ER/PgR was assessed, and each type of endocrine responsiveness was defined in the present study.

Clinically relevant genotype phenotype relationships have been investigated in the ECG ST-T waves, responses to epinephrine, types of arrhythmogenic trigger, responsiveness to antiarrhythmic agents, and risk stratification.

IL-5 has been shown to elicit a cholinergic type of hyper responsiveness in normal human bronchus and smooth muscle which could be blocked by IL-5 receptor antibodies [ 18].

In a sample of 207 children (100 female) from grades 2 to 7, we illustrated that assessment characteristics (i.e., stimulus type, answer choice, and response type) differentially impact patterns of responsiveness.

We cautiously remark that these suggestions are not intended for downplaying the importance of 'ideal-type' mutual responsiveness for responsible innovations, for undermining more refined conceptualisations of mutual responsiveness, or for giving reasons to neglect stakeholder involvement.