Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
In particular, we investigate to what extent they are robust with respect to changes in internal parameters, such as the splitting of scores in case of co-authorships, inclusion of all types of journal publications, and journal weighting.
Firstly, we not only investigate the impact of variations in journal weights but also in other internal parameters that have not been examined before such the way scores are split among co-authors and the weighting of different types of journal publications.
Specifically, our findings suggest that the Handelsblatt rankings of business economists tend to be more robust with respect to the allocation of scores among co-authors and full integration of all types of journal publication (i.e., book reviews, comments, corrections and editorials besides full original articles) than to systematic changes in journal weights.
The distribution of article formats also differed between the two types of journal (p < 0.001).
Abstracts from higher impact journals might contain more information and therefore yield higher quality scores than those from other types of journal.
In this section, we will first present the vocabulary used to describe organ transplantation in the two types of journal articles analyzed.
Similar(52)
There are two types of EGFR-blocking drugs.
There are so many types of HRT.
There are multiple types of Italian pasta.
There are two types of LPA.
There are two types of SPAT gardeners.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com