Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
When saliva is mechanically stimulated due to the large volume of water present in this type of saliva, would produce lower proteins concentration when compared with a resting saliva sample [27, 36].
The difference in the saliva pH between the two studies is likely the consequence of the different stimulation protocol (carbachol/isopreterenol-stimulated vs. pilocarpine-stimulated), different type of saliva collected (submandibular ductal saliva vs. whole saliva), and/or the difference in flow rate between ex vivo and in vivo approaches.
Furthermore, this study does not distinguish the type of saliva that generates gloss.
Both resting parotid saliva, and stimulated by an acidic lozenge (SST™, Salix Pharma, Stockholm, Sweden), were collected using Lashley cups; the first 0.1 ml was discarded and 1.5 ml collected of each type of saliva.
Similar(56)
Although the saliva on the tongue surface is a mixture of mucous and serous saliva, it is difficult to visually distinguish different types of saliva.
The decrease in the coefficient of friction for both types of saliva was explained by probable hydrodynamic effects because in the slower speed range (0.1 0.5 mm/s), the friction was constant, suggesting a boundary lubrication regime.
Second, a similar analysis was performed with two additional different types of saliva: one secreted specifically from the parotid gland and the other from the submandibular/sublingual (Sm/Sl) glands.
Figure 3 shows the survival results obtained for SCC-25 cells exposed to CS with/without two other types of saliva – parotid and Sm/Sl saliva, collected under resting conditions in addition to the results obtained following the exposure of the cells to CS in the presence of whole saliva.
Corrosion behaviors of stainless steel (SS304), with attached Acidithiobacilus ferrooxidans (ATF) bacteria and exposed to three different types of artificial saliva solutions, namely: (1) Jenkin's solution, (2) Tomasi's solution, and (3) NaCl solution, have been monitored using electrochemical noise (ECN) analysis and signal processing techniques.
Three types of specimen (saliva, urine, and serum) were collected from individual animals and pooled.
Gp-340 I to III typing of parotid saliva was done by Western blot using mAb143 directed to the gp-340 protein core [ 9, 25].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com