Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(32)
Variables in the LROI database that were checked for validity were sex, date of birth, hospital patient number, encrypted personal identity number, diagnosis, ASA score, type of prosthesis, fixation, cemented component (in cases of hybrid fixation), product number of component and cement, type of revision, revised component, and conversion to THA or conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
If an arthroplasty is revised, the surgeon reports time, reason, and type of revision.
The 5-year cumulative percent revision of revised primary resurfacing procedures was 9% and this varied depending on the type of revision.
The type of revision operation depends on the failures at the various interfaces and a good outcome can be produced consistently if the interface problems are managed appropriately.
Otherwise, no differences were found in outcome measures based on the type of revision surgery, the presence of weight-bearing restrictions, or the presence of orthopedic complications.
Studies reporting results of this type of revision surgery showed a significant improvement of outcome scores in the follow-up period [33, 34].
Similar(28)
The types of revision operations were arranged into 6 categories (Table 2).
The most common types of revision are a femoral-only revision (62%), acetabular and femoral revision (29%), and acetabular-only revision (9%).
A major revision involves the exchange of a component that interfaces with bone and a minor revision involves all other types of revision.
Survival analyses were undertaken separately for the different types of revision TKAs (revision total knee arthroplasty with resurfaced patella, or non-resurfaced patella) and the different prosthesis brands.
Although 9 patients had received one-stage revision treatment, and 10 had received two-stage revision treatment, the recurrent nature of infection meant that 2 patients (Anthony and Francis) had experienced both types of revision treatment.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com