Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
There was no effect modification by type of exacerbation.
Clinical parameters and discharge levels of proADM allow accurate long-term prognostication in COPD patients independent of initial type of exacerbation.
Whatever the type of exacerbation (outpatient/inpatient), there was a good correlation between the CAT scores and the CCQ scores, both at exacerbation onset (R = 0.748; p < 0.0001), and once the patient had recovered (R = 0.780; p < 0.001).
The factors that will be considered are: age, sex, LRTI subgroup, PSI and CURB65 score in CAP patients and GOLD criteria and Anthonisen type of exacerbation in COPD patients [ 18, 23].
Similar(56)
Anthonisen's classification never intended to establish the severity of exacerbation using type of exacerbations (type 1, 2 and 3) but rather which patient could benefit from being treated with antibiotics.
Results show that CCQ change is associated with the type of exacerbations, i.e., types 1 and 2 but not type 3, as reflected in all CCQ domains (table 2).
Table 3 shows the risks of different types of exacerbations by GOLD state for the different treatment alternatives.
This suggests that the two treatments exerted their effects on exacerbations via different mechanisms, and raises the possibility that the different drug classes of bronchodilator are affecting exacerbations (or types of exacerbations) in different ways; these differences may also reflect the anti-inflammatory effects of the ICS component [ 14].
§ p < 0.05 Figure 3 shows change in CCQ-total scores for different types of weeks, irrespective of exacerbation type (Anthonisen I -, II - and III).
Therefore, we should consider the possibility that mechanical ventilation per se, ventilator setting, and type of infusion become exacerbation factors for organ dysfunction after the renal IRI.
Presenting complaints like cough, breathlessness, night symptoms, type of asthma, frequency of exacerbation per year and family history of allergy or asthma were comparable between both the groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com