Exact(60)
Of its type it was a classic.
type it is".
Did you type it?
[email protected]: <= Type it again.
Or did you type it?
It feels weird to even type it.
Just type it into Google, alright?
Enter it again: <- Type it again.
But as a type, it keeps good company.
Type it in at the top of the manuscript.
True to type, it is squarely neo-traditional.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com